In the current world where “everybody knows everything” thanks to the internet and especially the gurus of Twitter and PMS-es, it takes me a while to appreciate what I didn’t have in the early 2010s.
I didn’t have any ready-made brokerage reports (of mid/small cap firms), didn’t have instant Whatsapp alerts on stocks-too-many, didn’t have gurus enumerating global gyaan on twitter/whatsapp and obviously didn’t have ready made tools like screener/tikr/tijori/trendlyne. What I did have were starting valuations which were loaded in our favor (of course, not so clear at that point in time).
Just a bit of quick personal history for context (not that anybody should care): I was a dabbler in the markets for 2-3 years (like everybody else) in the stock market boom of 2005-7. More career-oriented than markets-oriented, I always believed (like any young man passing out of MBA would firmly believe) that building a company/career/becoming a CEO quickly was the main goal in life. Moved to the US, worked for a few years, came back from US due to personal reasons and started investing seriously only since 2010 (October 2010 to be precise). Too little capital, too many investment options across asset classes but somehow, through pure fortune of luck ended up completely into equity investing. Even today, more than 99% of my networth is in equities
This post got triggered ironically, due to one Whatsapp image that was shared today morning – which said that Avanti Feeds moved up 214x, Caplin Point moved up 115x and so on and so forth – essentially stocks which would have made one fabulous returns only if you could identify them back at the start of the decade. And everybody starts discussions around what could be such stocks for the next decade (because, you know, this was the past decade, we couldn’t identify these stocks and no benefit brooding over them – but we somehow now believe we have a magic wand to identify stocks for the next decade like WA social investing/Twitter guru-ing).
What the image doesn’t or will not tell you are the starting valuations across the market in many many pockets across various sectors. They were very cheap. I made 20x of my initial capital in those 5 years between 2011-15. By 2015, the markets had moved up quite a bit, and that capital moved up only by 6x in the ensuing 5 years of 2016-20. All of this was no skill at all – just that the starting valuations were insanely cheap for an exponential rise in market prices when the earnings eventually came (atleast in 2011-15 period, earnings did come).
Some of the stocks were at unbelievable valuations really – ISGEC was at negative working capital, quoting close to cash (which eventually became 7x in 1 year) post a buyback trigger; Mayur Uni was consistently growing at 20% with 25% RoCE at 8x PE (again, a 10x in 3-4 years); Tasty Bites was so cheap and when earnings for 1 quarter came through in Aug 2014, the stock went 3x in 1 year (and eventually a 20x in 3 years); and I can go on and on. Avanti Feeds, Shilpa Medicare, Astral Poly, Bharat Rasayan, Kaveri Seeds and many more. Looking back, it was a matter of choice to decide which stock to buy for more returns than which stock to reject because of downside risk (of course, I am oversimplifying some complications, but not by much because of valuations). The most important thing, and this is the most important thing – was mistakes were made, but the cost of those mistakes was very less, and re-investment into some other attractive stock was much easier. However, in the last 2-3 years given the increased valuations across the market, only Alkyl Amines (6x in last 3 years) and HLE Glascoat (7x in 1 year) provided such asymmetrical opportunities where one could deploy large capital.
Of course, there is insane selection bias when I say multiples have moved up substantially across various sectors in the market but there is general consensus that we now have multiples awaiting earnings over the next few years rather than the other way round at the start of this decade. You make a mistake now at these valuations with large allocations, and it can set back one’s CAGR for many years. That’s the key difference.
Which comes back to my main point. The past decade, whoever started investing in say 2009-12 period achieved super-normal returns in this decade not entirely due to skill (and no skill in my case), but because the starting valuations were so cheap that, like that advertisement goes, all one had to do was sit back, relax and click on ‘Buy’ button. Whoever started in 2014-16 period achieved very good returns (but not super-normal) given the starting valuations were not so cheap. As close to certainty of bet there is (which is obviously dangerous in markets like ours), I am fairly confident that the next decade’s returns will not be as attractive as this decade (neither ‘supernormal’ nor ‘very good’) just purely because of starting valuations across sectors of the market (except for small cap/mid cap infra/cap goods/power, valuations across the board are higher even accounting for Covid abnormality). One will get 2x-3x (in 1-2 years) opportunities periodically even in this market (with more drawdown risks), but for investors with smaller capital, 2x-3x doesn’t change lives.
And that’s the rub. Information explosion + up-to-minute stock updates + twitter gurus cannot beat starting valuations. And we have no choice but to make do with it. Of course, like any good/bad MBA will vouch for (as we are CYA experts), we will always say that there will be exceptions and exceptional people who will find hidden gems which will grow exponentially especially if they have a large opportunity and fire in the belly and therefore have supernormal/very good returns. But they will be very few and far in between over the next decade.
Thanks to this super decade of returns (and thanks to all the close friends from the investing world I have I had the privilege to know personally over the past decade who have made my investing skillset look sharper than it is in reality). Every decade turns up new, churns up new, chews up the old. So, here’s bidding goodbye to 2020 (and the decade of 2011-20) and here’s cheers to 2021 and the new decade to follow!
Disclosure: I have owned stocks mentioned in the blogpost in the past, and may continue to own some of them now (and sold many of the others mentioned in the past already). I am NOT a registered investment advisor and these stocks are NOT a buy/sell recommendation. Kindly don’t base your Buy/Sell decisions based on the above blogpost. My returns have not been audited by any blue-blooded accounting firm, nor do I have any PMS to sell to you – so, please consider all the returns mentioned above as fiction.
Given GMM’s steep valuation of 6000 cr (and wide coverage), there has been a lot of curiosity around HLE / Swiss Glascoat amalgamation and how it stacks up against GMM. I had written the note below to myself back in November 2019 before investing into the stock (I hardly write detailed notes like this – but wanted to be a bit more clearer in my mind before I increased position). Hopefully, this note answers many of the questions that exist currently.
Before I proceed with the note, please note that I am NOT a registered investment advisor. This is NOT a stock recommendation. This is NOT an advise to buy/sell. This is just to layout my readings and learnings about any particular business in a couple of pages – and hope to learn from the blog readers if there is any new angle to this. To reiterate, I have written this note in November 2019 and don’t know if it is a Buy or a Sell today/tomorrow – in that sense, as is the case with all my blogs, it’s pretty useless to read anymore from hereon. I have avoided mentioning any future financial projections in the post deliberately (making it utterly useless to scroll to the bottom immediately to check the projected numbers).
Disc: I own a position. No buys/sells in the last 30 days.
Risks (or why should one not invest in this company)
- Fortunes of this business are tied to fortunes of its customer industries- Pharmaceuticals, Agrochemicals and Specialty Chemicals. If you believe that these industries are not going to invest and grow, one should not invest in this business
- There are massive tailwinds visible due to China shift. There is a tremendous amount of capex that’s being incurred by all the chemical/agrochemical companies due to this marginal China shift. If you believe that this capex will stop all of a sudden / slow down considerably and this shift from China is only temporary, one should not invest in this business
- If you believe only in liquid large cap (or liquid any cap), then one should not invest in this business as this is illiquid (although there is enough liquidity at a price)
However, if you are interested in understanding (and/or investing) an Oligopoly business with a visible China shift resulting in strong tailwinds in a relatively robust capital goods equipment company serving this tailwind, please read on.
What does this company do?
First of all, HLE Glascoat is a merger of 2 companies – HLE (which was unlisted, and is a market leader in filters & dryers) which bought Swiss Glascoat (which was listed and is the 2nd largest player in the reactors equipment space)
First about Swiss Glass (given it was listed earlier), and we will then proceed to HLE.
Swiss Glascoat Equipments (SGEL) specializes in design and manufacturing of carbon steel glass lined equipment [GLE] (reactors, receivers / storage tanks, columns, valves, pipes & fittings). These products are sold to Pharmaceutical / API, Specialty Chemicals, Dyes/ Colours, Agro Chemicals, Food Processing and allied industries.
SGEL manufactures both smaller sized reactors and very large reactors and the general replacement in this industry happens over 7-10 years. Corrosive conditions and client mistakes determine replacement.
Glass Lined Equipment (GLE) are used where lot of chemical reactions are to take place. Any other material would get corroded in those harsh conditions. Glass lined equipment is a corrosion resistant material used in varying processes of operation from production of pharmaceuticals to specialty chemicals and polymers. Glass lined equipment prevents materials exposed to harsh chemicals (acids, alkalis, water, and other chemicals) from getting corroded and thereby preventing failure in the equipment.
GLE is an integral part of Pharmaceutical, Agrochemical and Specialty chemical companies. Removing & replacing it is not an easy process & downtime in case of quality issue costs the companies a lot of money. As a result, companies don’t compromise in quality for GLE.
A 4 minute video on SGEL – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDz3y7575ZE&t=1s
GLE equipment is an oligopoly, with GMM being the market leader (50% market share) and Swiss Glascoat being the 2nd largest player (25-30% market share). The remaining market in the GLE segment is captured by Die Dietrich (acquired Nile Ltd’s glass lining business in 2012 – and now up for sale – either will be bought by GMM or HLE), Sachin Industries and Standard Glass lining – all these 3 players have marketshare in lower single digits.
What are the industry tailwinds?
Fortunes of this business are tied to fortunes of its customer industries- Pharmaceuticals, Agrochemicals and Specialty Chemicals. All these industries are growing at 10-15% CAGR due to various industry-specific factors –
- Very well-known news that China has been making its pollution norms stricter, which is making India as the new hub for Chemical Industry. Even a 5-10% shift will lead to significant volume shift to India. GMM in one of its concalls stated that Gharda Chemicals (one of the largest agrochem companies in India earlier used to order 10 GLEs per year, but have now started ordering 30-40 GLEs per year)
- Cost of production in India is significantly lower than the developed world which gives it a competitive advantage and hence, a strong boost to outsource work (make/ produce/ do R&D) in India
- India has among the world’s lowest usage of Agrochemicals and initiatives from the government and agrochemical companies is increasing the awareness in farmers, thereby boosting the agrochemical usage
- 100% FDI is allowed in the Chemical industry
- The current run rate of capex in these segments in FY20 should be around 6,000 odd crores and of that around 2% to 10% should be coming for the GLE players. Another 2-10% will flow to filtration and drying equipment. In all, looks like about ~600 cr worth of GLE and Filtration equipment per year that is majorly going to flow to 2 oligopoly players (GMM – market leader in GLE and Swiss/HLE – market leader in filtration/drying). This opportunity (if the China shift continues) will grow by 10-15% atleast for the next 2-3 years
So – what changed and why now?
SGEL was run by Mr. Sudarshan Amin till Nov 2016. Mr. Amin was the promoter of the company with stake of around 35% in SGEL. Due to succession issues (both daughters living in the US), he sold the business to HLE Engineers. HLE Engineers (run by Mr. Himanshu Patel and Mr. Aalaap Patel) took a majority stake in Nov 2016. HLE Engineers is a leader in Filtration and Drying equipment in India (> 50% market share) with a similar set of customers as SGEL (in fact, there was a 60-70% overlap in customers between HLE Engineers and Swiss). HLE Engineers decided to amalgamate SGEL in Jan 2019. Post all shareholder/SEBI/lenders/NCLT approval, HLE Engineers business will now be a amalgamated entity within the listed entity SGEL starting 25th Nov 2019.
SGEL had 65 lakh shares. HLE Engineers valued itself to ~150 cr (very reasonable in my opinion considering it’s a market leader in a growing segment) for amalgamation (including preference shares). HLE Engineers amalgamation will add another 65 lakh shares – thereby taking the total equity base to 1.3 cr shares (apart from preference shares (which will result in a 1 cr outflow every year starting FY20)). From multiple secondary checks and cross-references with customers, there appears to be no corporate governance issues in the group.
Essentially, our estimate is that the tri-criteria of lower sales, lower margins and lower multiple will move to higher sales, higher margins and higher multiple leading to decent returns over the next 2-3 years
Ok, tell me more about HLE Engineers?
A 2 minute video to start with on HLE engineers – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkw0Y6bH31U
Initially, HLE Engineers started with the name Indosal chemicals based out of Thane by Dr.Kushalbhai Patel (got doctorate in chemical engineering from USA) in 1950. Indosal used to manufacture salicylic acid (Aspirin) and faced lot of issues due to labor and political issues. Hence, moved to Navsari. Based on Indosal’s requirements, the management slowly started manufacturing equipment needed for our chemical manufacturing and gradually, started catering to others as well. Over the period of time, Indosal have gained knowledge and leadership in Agitated Nutsche Filter (ANFD) and Rotary Vacuum Paddle Dryer (RVD). Therefore, Indosal started the journey as a chemical manufacturer and eventually evolved as an engineering company in HLE Engineers.
Why is HLE Engineers exciting?
HLE Engineers are market leaders in India in the Filtration and Drying equipment with more than 50% market share in this segment. ANFD and RVD which contributes eighty percent of engineering segment (the rest 20% being contributed by the chemical segment which is run with minimal capex and working capital). HLE sells about 350-400 units every year which is increasing at a rapid rate due to the ongoing chemical/agrochem/pharma capex. Every API, agrochem, and specialty chemical plant needs this product. These products are evolving by replacing centrifuges. This ANFD and RVD products used to be exotic previously (being bought only by larger companies) but due to ongoing increase in complexity of chemical reactions across the value chain, almost all companies have started using this (and higher the complexity, higher are the realizations for HLE filtration and drying equipment). There are operational efficiencies as well in using ANFD/RVD over centrifuges due to which demand is expanding exponentially. For example, multiple centrifuges have to be employed to clear out single GLR (glass line reactor) reaction batch, whereas with the use of ANFD, the entire batch can be processed in one go. Centrifuges also require regular maintenance with the bearings breaking down frequently, which is not the case with a ANFD/RVD.
So, clearly, a market leader with exciting economics in an increasing opportunity.
What are the economics of this business?
Based on the complexity and volumes in chemical/pharma/agrochem plants, ANFD/RVD products give higher cost advantage over the time. For a 100 crore plant, both products cost can anywhere between 2-10 percent based on corrosiveness, usage of exotic material etc. Unlike Swiss Glascoat (or GMM), these filtration and drying equipment are completely order driven business although, HLE Engineers are trying to get lower-priced standardized equipment to sell at a mass scale for the smaller and medium sized enterprises who cannot afford a customized order (for its price point and advances that need to be secured to HLE).
And market share?
From a market share perspective in the filtration and drying equipment space, HLE has a > 50% market share, and Bifriends Filters having 10% market share. Advances for this business range anywhere between 0% and 30% depending on client relationships. Currently, only 10% of HLE business is coming from exports. There is a renewed focus on exports, and HLE is quite confident of making deeper inroads and grow exports significantly from hereon.
The expectation from HLE business (filtration and drying) is that they will grow at 15% CAGR in revenues with increasing realizations and can grow till 300 cr revenues without any further capex. The management in the AGM mentioned that “It is not about physical infrastructure, skilled people availability is big issue. We need to maintain quality with through inspections. Along with capacities, organizational culture needs to improve. Every project is different. With increasing ticket sizes, sense of urgency in capex, significant increase in number of enquiries, we are confident of scaling this business along with growing our team and culture”
The other business within HLE Engineers
HLE Engineers also has a chemical business. However, all these are old products with minimal margins and running at 40-50 cr turnover. Given that the chemical plant is in the same shared infrastructure as HLE engineers, the management has decided to run it minimal capex, minimal working capital and at breakeven till they shut it down eventually in short order. They are focusing on improving yields and running at high capacity. They primarily manufacture Sodium Nephthionate, Dichloro aniline (DCA) which is an intermediate used in food colors, dyes and pigments.
Back to Swiss Glascoat. How does HLE coming in change things here?
HLE management, post taking over SGEL have undertaken multiple initiatives (as the previous management was not very focused on efficiencies and capturing the opportunity):
- Spent 15 crore capex and increased capacity by 30-40 percent. Initially SGLE used to have 900-1000 units capacity, but now increased to 1400 units and will further increase to 2000 units in short order. At maximum capacity utilization, SGEL can reach 250 -300 crore turnover and given the industry tailwinds, will also have increasing margins
- SGEL under the previous management was dependent on a single supplier for raw materials (specialized carbon steel) and therefore pricing was dictated by the supplier. Inventory days in SGEL were always high due to this reason. However, post HLE taking over, they have developed one more supplier and are slowly bringing the inventory days down. HLE would require stainless steel for filtration equipment and the management opines that they can get buying efficiencies due to a larger scale and a consolidated list of suppliers for both
- Installed gas furnaces instead of electric which will improve cost efficiency as well as quality of the end equipment
- Spares contributes 5 percent of the turnover (vis-à-vis 10-12% in GMM). HLE management is actively trying to increase the percentage of spares sales
- Substantial debottlenecking done in the plant
- Changed lay out of the plant for better operations
The main competition is GMM – who is a market leader in GLE (50% market share) and competition in the filtration/drying equipment of 20%. Enough and more reports are available on GMM, along with multiple quarterly conference call notes over the past few years. GMM has 2800 units capacity for GLE (while Swiss has ~1600-2000 units depending on state of current expansion). With similar industry dynamics and tailwinds, market leader in Filters/Dryers and close competitor in GLE, HLE Glascoat (on an amalgamated entity basis) quotes reasonably.
The other competitors (unlisted) is Suryamani in GLE equipment and Bifilters (unlisted) in Filtration and Drying apart from Die Dietrich who is reducing its presence in India (and the plant may be bought by either GMM or HLE – and given it’s plant’s presence in Hyderabad, might work very well to serve as a hub for all pharma companies in Telangana, AP and Karnataka).
A quick comparison of past financials tells a story:
Few observations clearly stand out:
- The gross margin profile of GLE equipment is very similar (+/- 100 bps). Indicates that on ‘product selling to various customers’, there is very little difference in terms of pricing/customer profile/product range
- PBIT or EBITDA margins are much better in GMM compared to Swiss. This boils down to efficiencies of operations and the plant. With the new management at Swiss taking over and incorporating changes, expanding capacities, changing layouts, gas furnace instead of electric furnaces etc., and therefore should ideally expect Swiss margins to trend up
- There are other operational efficiencies that come with scale of operations – GMM has 2.2x sales of Swiss, which points to and validates the market leadership of GMM
Summary of Amalgamated Entity
As per AGM interaction:
- They expect SGEL to clock a 30% CAGR growth for the next 2-3 years with increasing margins (~op margins of 15% are achievable)
- They expect HLE Engineers to clock a 15% CAGR growth for the next 2-3 years with increasing margins
- They expected to reach 500 cr turnover by FY22, but looking at the wave of orders, they are expecting a combined 500 cr turnover by FY21
As an aside, we continue to see medium-to-large capex from all pharma and agrochem companies – referencing multiple EC documents along with the Govt. announcing a lot of sops for taking advantage of the China shift in the near future.
The core of the thesis is as below:
- Given that we don’t have to track any chemical prices but still want to participate in the chemical/pharma/agrochem tailwind story, we are comfortable investing in an Engineering company – where we might get more predictable earnings and returns if the capex for these companies continues to happen with not many variables
- This seems to be the classic capital goods story where pricing power increases basis market tailwinds and valuation multiples can re-rate given HLE Glascoat is a market leader in the non-GLE segment and a close 2nd in the GLE segment.
Please note that the above note was written in November 2019. Kindly don’t base your Buy/Sell decisions based on the above note. I am NOT a registered investment advisor and this is NOT a buy/sell recommendation.
I work for a strategy consulting firm (not in the pharma domain). And often, industry outsiders primarily look at us as ‘hawabaazi’ /’seeing our watch and telling us the time’ – which is an extremely good place to start with. Sets low expectations. And as we all know, low expectations is the key to happiness as well as over-achievement. So, here is the ‘hawabaazi’ view of how I am seeing Pharma as of today – mostly will try to delineate the Hope vs Reality of the current situation. As usual, any of the stocks mentioned below are NOT stock recommendations and I am NOT a registered investment advisor. This is for learning and exchanging views.
The Return of Pharma Growth
Indian pharma companies were in deep capex mode from FY15-FY19. And there were also pricing pressures in the most lucrative market (US). Now
a) the pricing pressures are easing because of Covid
b) more FDA approvals are forthcoming which means FDA will not be as strict as they were in the FY15-FY19 period
c) pharma is a recurring consumption (in most parts) and no lockdown has affected this spending and therefore predictable growth than other sectors atleast for FY21
d) Most pharma companies have ended their capex and are re-looking at their capital allocations vis-à-vis the markets and are focused more on emerging markets and India where pricing isn’t so bad and hence RoCEs will return with lesser capex and better pricing and
e) somehow we are in a ‘strategic’ position to help US scale up on their manufacturing.
So, large growing opportunity. Hence bullish.
I will try to answer a) and b) in detail below, but just to answer the other questions (c-e) quickly.
c) is a temporary phenomenon – but might be important for flows
d) opportunity size is limited and too many players are focusing on it all at once (which essentially means, increased competition, ergo reduced returns) and
e) is in the category of ‘what are you smoking’ (Mylan itself has 8 API manufacturing facilities and 2 formulation facilities in India – with enough US incentives, they can help a whole range of mfg scale)
So, coming back to a) and b).
So, a) why did pricing pressures come about?
- In the year 2007, there were 11 distributors who would buy your products – wholesalers (Amerisource Bergen, Cardinal Health, McKesson), Retailers (Walgreens, CVS, Rite Aid, Pharmacy benefit management (PBMs) (Express Scripts, Caremark, Medco) and Key global distributors (Alliance Boots, Celesio) covering 80% of the generics market
- And then, buyer consolidation started happening. From 2015-16, there are only 3 wholesalers/retailers (Walgreens Boots alliance having 31% market share, Red Oak (erstwhile Cardinal Health + CVS) having 27% market share and McKesson (Celesio, Rite Aid merged with McKesson) having 24% market share. That’s 82% market share between 3 players
- So, when people talk (or more likely give goli) about pricing pressures easing, the one question you need to ask is – what has changed? Did any of the Big Three break their alliance? Have the Big Three become more lenient than ruthless? Is there a 4th major player emerging who will buy your products? What exactly are the factors that will lead to pricing pressures easing? Even if they ease for certain products due to Covid (or due to certain supply shocks which will close quickly), there is no strategic rationale for pricing pressures to ease over the longer term
- Add this to the surge in ANDA approvals from almost all Indian pharma players in 2015-19 period (ergo, more competition, lower generic prices) and combine with buyer consolidation – why will the pricing pressure suddenly ease off?
The generics market in the US has been in the range of USD 75-80B for the past 5 years – and I don’t see a reason why this will suddenly increase when there is no new segment (like biosimilars) that are folks are getting into (we have had high hopes of making our mark in ‘complex/specialty generics’ and therefore increase this number – but as I elucidate below, that’s a pipe dream as well).
So, b) More FDA approvals forthcoming
I am not sure why market participants are excited about this development. No one getting the approval is almost the same as everyone getting an approval – the whole point of making profits is scarcity and exclusivity. Time was ripe for compliant-players to make a lot of money when everyone else was getting FDA VAIs and OAIs. But everyone getting a FDA green signal – why would you be excited? So essentially, more approvals -> more supply -> more competition -> no
That being said, if you analyse the FDA approvals coming by, except for Lupin and Aurobindo plant, most of the EIRs that were received were for VAI plants and not OAI plants. But people will also point out specific events like Ipca’s HCQ being exempted from a OAI plant? But folks, this is not the first time. FDA had exempted 10 molecules from Divi’s plant when it received a OAI (Ranbaxy and Wockhardt were provided similar exemptions in the past inspite of OAI on their plants, depending on the criticality of the molecule). Some sharper folks will also point out to expedited ANDA approvals as a sign that FDA is easing (or the company in question is a visionary or both) like it happened for Cipla’s Albuterol inhaler. But the point to note is that this inhaler was needed for patients with respiratory issues when Covid struck – we can’t really extrapolate this generic data to all of pharma, just because we think Pharma is a ‘Buy’.
The overall strategic point being – don’t be excited because neither has buyer consolidation gone away and neither has competition intensity decreased (and definitely don’t go by the golis in webinars by pharma MFs). And people will definitely not consume more medicines because there is Covid.
Of course, these days every drug is a specialty drug – even paracetamol and metformin are called specialty drugs by anyone bullish on pharma. But what is the true definition of specialty pharma? Specialty pharma is usually oral or injectable medications (which are complex medications) usually used to treat complex chronic conditions. Their features typically include a) high cost ($1000/day for 30 day supply) b) high complexity (complex R&D, biologic/biosimilar, orphan drugs etc.) and c) high touch.
Specialty pharma is a large market (USD 1000B globally) of which specialty pharma share is about 28%. US is a USD 400B market, of which specialty’s share is about 36%. India lags, with only 8% of specialty pharma share in a USD 15B market. The top three therapies globally in specialty pharma are Oncology (30% share), Auto-immune disorders (28% share) and Anti-viral medications (17% share).
There are many players in India doing specialty pharma, and there have been some very attractive exits as well in this market (Gland pharma to Fosun, Claris to Baxter, Agila to Mylan etc.). Given these exits, coupled with high growth and large market size, no wonder everyone in India’s pharma industry wanted to get on the bandwagon on specialty pharma and just leverage it to the hilt (and everyone singing praises as usual).
Indian pharma companies (save for Biocon) have traditionally had a DNA of generics-at-scale. A few of the better ones tried and have been successful at branded-generics-at-scale. But a lot of them didn’t have the DNA to do specialty pharma – and given the attractive nature of the specialty market, especially in the US – tried acquiring the DNA.
- Some of the large acquisitions over the past decade – Cadila (acquiring Sentynl for Rs. 9B in 2017, and already wrote off 30% with more to come), Dr. Reddy’s (acquiring lot of Teva’s ANDAs at $350M and writing off 75% of it), Lupin (acquiring Gavis pharma at $880M, writing most of it off), Torrent (acquiring Bio-pharm) etc.
- We have traditionally lagged with the lucrative part of the specialty segment like inhalers, transdermals and long acting injectables. However, broadly, Dr. Reddy’s has announced exit from specialty front-end (sold off all neurology brands and most of dermatology brands – had targeted $400M revenue by FY22 – which now of course is not achievable), Cipla has spoken about reducing complex/specialty pharma investments (with focus primarily on respiratory/inhalers), Lupin of course has written off most of Gavis (and exiting Japan completely – a geography which constitutes 20% of Lupin’s sales), and Sun Pharma unable to launch any complex generics after Doxil and Gleevec (their US specialty revenue of $400M coming primarily from only 2 brands)
- With the changing US pharma industry’s dynamics (more below), almost all pharma players are pivoting completely and now directing their capital to the double-digit growth and faster capital turnaround spaces of India and Rest of World (read China, Brazil, Canada)
- Conclusion being – not many pharma players will continue their investments in the complex/specialty pharma space as the market dynamics are extremely difficult. So, the lucrativeness of ‘specialty pharma’ – next time you know what to say.
The overall strategic point being – almost everyone has bolted from the specialty pharma market in the most lucrative geography (US). Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise
Biologics are a USD 300B market globally, and there are 4-5 companies in the top 10 pharma companies whose sole claim to fame is biologics. Everyone thought that we would replicate the successes of brands to generics in the biosimilar market as well.
I mean, why not, right? Biologics was a fast growing market and many biologics have gone off patent in the last 10 years and US alone is a USD 11B market, with rest of the world growing much ahead of the US. Biologics was solving some unique problems that chemical-based drugs weren’t able to solve earlier (several auto-immune disorders, rheumatoid arthritis etc.) and the insurance companies (and payers) were looking to reduce this ever growing cost.
So, what gives? Why are our pharma companies not making money hand over fist? Do you know large companies like Sun Pharma don’t even have any publicly known biologic/biosimilar development in place? If Sun Pharma doesn’t want to expend resources, who else has the capability to do it? Will we ever get on the biosimilar gravy train?
- First place to understand the present is to look at the past. So, why did chemical-based generics succeed? Even better, why did the Indian pharma companies succeed in the generics space? That’s because there was an extremely mature Hatch-Waxman act of 1984 that had an extensive framework of time and litigation for branded patent drugs to convert to generics. Almost the entire success of our Generics industry can be boiled back to this one act that the US enacted. 30 months delay for litigated drugs, ANDAs, 180-day exclusivity, state laws allowing generic forms to be substituted automatically by pharmacists for brand-name drugs prescribed by physicians, so long as physicians have not specified that the prescription must be ‘‘dispensed as written’ (also called ‘interchangeability’ – remember this!) and so on and so forth. Extremely mature framework and predictability for both the patent owners as well as generics
- Compared to the mature Hatch-Waxman act, the US implemented the BPCIA act for Biosimilars. BPCIA was enacted in 2009, but the first USFDA approved biosimilar came in only in 2015. I have read quite a few articles on this act, and my basic understanding is that the act is so poorly written that there have been litigations at every stage of a biosimilar evaluation (for example, naming of biosimilars, scope of patent dance protocols, and of course the big one ‘interchangeability’. There are many conflicts and cases around this, but one of the primary reasons seems to be ‘principle-based litigation’ (read up Sandoz-Amgen case for more clarity on this topic). But it basically boils down the litigation costs, and more than costs, it is the timeline that’s killing most of the biosimilar pipeline. So, very capital ineffective so far because the litigation and the basic act for this litigation is not very clear and can be interpreted in various ways (Industry insiders call it the ‘time-climb’). US currently has only 12 biosimilars approved and 3 commercialized – 11 years after the Act came into place
- Just to be clear, the approval timelines for biosimilar applications have come down to 10-12 months. However, almost all firms (and not just Indian firms) underestimated the amount of resources required to fight litigations in the US market. Given this ‘time-climb’ and the associated costs, the generic player wanting to launch a biosimilar will not want to cut price steeply to launch. Imagine this – when a chemical-based drug goes off patent and if there are more than 4 filers for that drug, the price post patent cliff is 80-90% lower in most cases. In case of biosimilar, the price cuts have not been more than 10-20%, which basically is not an incentive enough for the insurers in the market to push their payers down this route (And as cases of Humira and Remicade are proof, the original biologic player themselves shave off the price by 10-20% to prevent the biosimilar player to make any money). Of course, with ‘interchangeability’ a mandatory guideline for the US markets, the doctors are also not willing to take a risk on the biosimilar – resulting in very poor risk-reward for the generic player in biosimilars
- So, does that mean Biosimilar potential is dead? Not necessarily. Let’s look at Germany for instance. Insurers incentivize hospitals and clinics to use cheaper options like biosimilars. The regulation in Europe around ‘interchangeability’ is fairly clear which means lesser litigations, which means the cost-to-market is lesser, which means there is a combination of price-cuts and market acceptance. Add to that, there are marquee players in Germany like KfH, the largest network of dialysis in Germany (30% of dialysis patients) who actively promoted the case of biosimilars (in this case, Epoetin). Therefore, the crucial play is lower regulatory hurdle (lesser litigations, not necessarily lesser stringency) -> lower time and cost of clearing the molecule -> cost benefits passed on to payers (forced by insurers and marquee players) -> rapid acceptance
- So, what does this mean for Indian pharma? If I look down the list of biosimilar filers, most of them are global MNCs Pfizer, Amgen, Merck, Sandoz etc., who are huge multinationals with deep pockets. The cost of bringing a biosimilar to the market is estimated to be $100M-$200M (with the attendant risks listed above) vis-à-vis $1M – $5M in case of a chemical-based drug. Our Indian pharma players have had successes in the emerging markets (for example, Dr Reddy’s with the world’s first Rituximab biosimilar, Zydus Cadila’s Exemptia etc. and other players like Intas, Lupic, Cadila making headways in the emerging markets. However, Biocon is the only player with a US/EU presence (that too in partnership with Mylan) and Intas-Apotex partnership in this area is also promising (given Intas’ amazing presence and distribution) in Europe. But the real money is in the US – and unfortunately, not many players have even invested in the pipeline (Cipla exited the biosimilar pipeline in FY17 with a Rs. 2.5B write-off in Cipla Biotec, Cadila wanted to enter US with the biosimilar pegfilgrastim, but have stopped burning cash on this, Lupin is probably the only player having some pipeline in Enbrel (with EU approval) and Neulasta, Dr. Reddy’s targeting only emerging markets, Glenmark looking for a partner for bXolair, Sun Pharma has no investments in biosimiars, and neither does Natco (the only probably strategy seems to be ‘acquire some company once the regulations/BPCIA is more clear – else, can’t understand their decision-making)
The overall strategic point being – Indian players have consciously avoided the Biosimilar markets primarily because of complexity and aukaat reasons. So, the question is where is the next leg of new segment growth going to come from for these players over the next decade (ergo, higher valuations)?
Essential summary of the entire blog – No structural changes for easing of pricing pressures in the US market, no specialty pharma traction, no biosimilar traction, extreme competition in the India (and RoW) markets building up – so, why is everyone excited about pharma?
P.S: Hope it was worth the time of reading a long blog post. More importantly, as you can see, it’s not too difficult to cross the ‘hawabaazi’ barrier 🙂
P.P.S: Lupin bought Gavis Pharma for $880M. Gavis had a manufacturing facility (which would be Lupin’s first in the US), 66 products pending approval from the US’s Food and Drugs Administration (USFDA), and another 65 niche dosage forms in the pipeline. Impressive filings and seemed like a strategic buy. But what went wrong that Lupin had to write-off of the whole thing? Well, the US government’s increased scrutiny around opioids (drugs that use narcotics in their formulation) – and Gavis had a lot of valuable filings in Opioids which Lupin was hoping to leverage. Given the regulatory scrutiny, it made getting USFDA approvals for some of Gavis’s products more difficult and shrunk the opioids market as well. And hence the write-off. But why was Lupin so confident of pulling off acquisitions? Because Lupin bought Antara (from Oscient pharma in 2009 – with sales of $85M) and AllerNaze (nasal spray from Collegium pharma) – both of which were runaway successes – which obviously induced them to go for bigger and bigger bets. Thought will leave you with a story, than just ‘hawabaazi’.
I like the word ‘angst’ – without going into the exact definition in Webster’s dictionary – conveys anger, frustration, desperation, exhaustion, anxiety, dread, worry etc. This one word – one word is all you need to know about what happened in March 2020 in the Indian markets (and world markets in general). Angst.
The Angst of Knowing: By now, you would have received letters from multiple PMS fund managers (either as their client or the very dependable Whatsapp forwards) talking about how they couldn’t see the havoc Corona would create in markets (and in life), and that they certainly understood the disease (having graduated from Whatsapp university) but underestimated the magnitude of the fall. In the same breath (as in, in the very next paragraph) will go on to tell you about how they think it’s only a 1-2 quarters disruption and that life will slowly get back to normal.
Of course, the discerning and erudite readers of this blog (haha!) will certainly notice a certain irony in those 2 paragraphs of almost any and every PMS letter you have read in March. But that’s their superpower – knowing, but not really knowing, and yet showcase that they actually know with sufficient disclaimers – and thereby the angst.
The Angst of Not Knowing: There are other sets of investors in the market where their stated position is ‘I don’t know’ / ‘I am not sure’ / ‘God knows what will happen’ which in summary can be termed on angst of not knowing. But why is it angst when you don’t know? Well, to start with, these ‘I am not sure’ investors are either in majority cash / majority invested. Mostly, majority cash. If you really don’t know – in the sense of ‘economy would go up or down’, ‘markets would go up or down’ – what would one truly do (keeping opinions aside)? The person would move to a 50:50 in terms of debt/cash : equity. That’s the true definition of ‘I am not sure which way things will go’.
So, the opinion (people take offense to the word ‘opinion’ these days – so, let’s say ‘stated position’) is ‘I don’t know’ but the action / positioning is ‘I think it will go to dogs’ (if you are mostly cash) or ‘I think we will recover well’ (if you are mostly invested). And to top it, all the ‘I am not sure’ investors are edgy – either to buy (so that they don’t miss the next upmove) or sell (so that they don’t miss the next downmove). And thereby the angst.
Truth in this Kali yuga has multiple hues and meanings. For the purposes of this blog, let’s assume that Truth is something that can be stated with facts, but truth and facts are not the same. If that doesn’t cause you angst, I don’t know what will – because ‘you can’t handle the truth’ (A few good men reminder!)
The truth of knowing: I mean, and the truth is there for everyone to see (with a little Google search) of how some star and worshipped fund managers spoke about ‘leadership-wonderful-analytics-leaders in sectors are built on amazing culture-holding this for 15 years secular theme’ etc. have bailed out of financial services at the first sign of trouble. The truth then, irrespective of what their history and geography have said in the past, is almost all who spouted the above are ‘momentum investors’ and don’t need to be held at a pedestal. Every past interview is laced with hindsight bias and information asymmetry.
Everyone knows and talks about sector rotation these days. And the sector rotation broader opinion (from groups and twitterati) is to move from ‘the-red-hot-financial-services’ that has given folks stellar returns over the past few years to the ‘much-safer-pharma-because-you-know-Corona-and-healthcare spends will increase’ or ‘tailwind-chemical-and-magical-specialty-chemical’ because ‘China shift’ and ‘consumer-staples-is-expensive’. But you know, that’s not generally true – as in the reasons, not sector rotation per se. Sector rotation to these exact same sectors is as old as the hills as the image below depicts (between, somehow ‘rotation’ is a bit offensive these days – because it implies you have completely sold out on the previous theme which you had claimed in your 1001 ‘letters to the investor’ that this is the theme for 15-20 years (as true as it is that you bailed on this theme, like I said, ‘you can’t handle the truth’ and hence the new, taaza jargon is ‘sector tilting’ – implies…you know what it implies…))
The truth of not knowing: In these days of Internet and rampant Whatsapp groups, there is nothing that is not known. I mean, people have become expert epidemiologists in about 2 weeks, in what generally takes 10-15 years of hard work. So, what is there to not know?
– Somehow, folks seem to know exactly where Nifty will end up in 6 months to 1 year (6000-6500 on the bear side, and 12500 on the bull side), but cannot for the world of it, state about 4-5 stocks that will give them 25% CAGR returns with reasonably high probability in 3 years.
– Somehow, folks seem to know exactly what kind of stimulus and how much stimulus India should give and why FRBM is not relevant in this Covid era, but cannot for the world of it, know how to become anti-fragile with their own finances.
– Somehow, folks seem to know how human behavior is going to undergo radical change because of Covid (and thereby the resultant businesses and endless discussions around it), but cannot predict their own behavior in a bull / bear market the next day.
Deep down, we all think we know it. Like everybody knows everything. But in reality, the truth is nobody knows anything. Or is it…
One of the wisest investors that I have had the privilege to know, asked me recently, after I told him a long story/thesis about a particular stock, ‘kuch action kiya kya?’. On reflection, that’s a perfect statement to balance the angst and the truth.
– If you are convinced / positioned (for the ‘I am not sure’ investors) that market is going to dogs and Nifty to 6000- 6500 (or pick any figure below the current figure), have you acted accordingly? In fact, to take the Soros/Druckenmiller route, have you bought puts/shorted futures to that effect?
It is general human behavior that if you are in majority cash (means negative on the market), you’d kind of secretly hope that the situation deteriorates further and you can then come as knight in shining armor and scoop up a lot of businesses at dirt cheap prices. You can in fact write a lot of eloquent and erudite pieces on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th order effects of any event (in life or in markets), especially a negative one. So, why not leverage this negativity and buy some puts / short the market for a small percentage of your portfolio to really drive a home run?
– Similarly, if you are convinced / positioned (for the ‘I am not sure’ investors) that market is going to back to near normal, FY21 is a washout for sure but most if not all businesses will be 70-80-90-100% there fully operational by FY22, have you acted accordingly? In fact, to take the Soros/Druckenmiller route, have you bought calls / long futures to that effect?
It is a completely abnormal human behavior to be optimistic in the face of such humanitarian crisis. Unlike the bear theory articles, you will hardly have any convincing arguments of why the market will go back up or why the businesses will go back to near-normal by FY22. The difficulty in such markets is not to find stocks which go up, but you want them to disproportionately go up – and that’s where the thinking gets stunted. If you are in the optimistic-bent camp of near-normal from FY22, and that bear markets are where stocks move 3% or 5% per day on the up (and missing out on certain days on some stocks will draw down your return significantly), then the key questions to ask are do you have a pipeline of stocks-at-certain-prices (realistic – not like HDFC bank at 200 rupees), why aren’t you buying stocks, shifting stocks and in general buying calls/long futures to drive a home run?
It’s not the opinion that counts – between the angst and the truth – because the opinions are too many, but it’s the action that counts. ‘How are you positioned’ / ‘What are you buying / selling’ is a much better indicator than ‘kya lagta hai market’. People can still lie, or tell you the partial truth, but that’s much better than an opinion and a narrative. Like the wise investor said, ‘kuch action kiya kya?’ – that’s the absolute truth in investing life.
Of course, we all love Howard Marks. How does he define ‘variant perception’? – He defines it as follows – “To be able to take advantage of such divergences, you have to think in a way that departs from the consensus; you have to think different and better. This goal can be described as “second-level thinking” or “variant perception.”” There is no variant perception in liking Howard Marks.
However, in the Indian markets, we all love to abuse, disabuse, misabuse and tetra-abuse any good concept. In Indian markets then, what is variant perception? In Indian markets, ‘variant perception’ is any perception variant that makes money. If it makes money, you can retrospectively determine that you had a variant perception and write detailed articles about it (or make podcasts, because that’s the fancy these days). If it doesn’t make money, well, nobody cares about your any perception, much less the variant perception.
If it makes money, your variant perception can be called coffee can (literally don’t know what this phrase means), else it will be trash can. For example, you can argue that you bought a stock (say, Merck or Abbott) at 40PE and your variant perception is (apart from all the fancy thesis which spans atleast 15 slides, if not 30) that it will go to 70PE (because, MNC something, something). If it makes money (like it has), people will call you a visionary. If it doesn’t, people are anyway ready to sell at 20% from top. If it’s a highly liquid stock, people will not even bother calling the bullshit on you. The variant perception being, ‘liquid hai to acha hai, chala to returns, nahi chala to exit’.
Anyway, with this being the case, sharing some of the ‘variant perception’ in 2019 for some of the stocks that I bought/hold (none of the stocks are a recommendation – it’s almost a guarantee that you will lose money on all my stocks mentioned below – so don’t try to buy them and you can’t short them because none are in F&O. So, please definitely consult your advisor before acting on any of the below. I am NOT a registered investment advisor). Most of the insights below are from multiple discussions with my friend ‘O’ – in that sense, they are our joint insights and I can’t claim sole credit for any of these (and hence ‘we’ reference below):
1) Alkyl Amines: The biggest consensus pick of 2019 in the mid/small cap space. The general thesis around this is that the management is fabulous, they are doing large capex (of Rs. 100 cr every year) after a very long time, they got into methyl amines (traditionally being the stronghold of their oligopoly competition ‘Balaji Amines’) and grabbing market share, large-ish capex from their customer base of pharma and agrochem etc. Of course, with continuous growth in earnings quarter on quarter, the frenzy feeds itself. We bought it much before this insight because of the above, but what really kicked in the adding to the position this year is the ‘variant perception’.
So, what’s really the variant perception in it? The insight around Acetonitrile – everybody wonders that Acetonitrile prices are volatile and we need to contact somebody to know the price of acetonitrile etc. But do you really know that this is a counter-auto-cyclical thingy? As in, if the auto cycle slows down, acetonitrile prices go up. In that sense, you can play this theme as a counter-cyclical to Auto slowdown. But why is this really so? This is because of the following:
- In the acrylonitrile and acetonitrile relationship, acrylonitrile is the economic driver primarily due to storage constraints as well. Approximately fifteen gallons of acetonitrile are produced for every 270 gallons of acrylonitrile; if the producer doesn’t have room to store the acrylonitrile, production of acetonitrile is reduced. This creates an inverse pricing relationship.
- So, what drives the acrylonitrile demand? The primary downstream consumer for acrylonitrile is ABS (acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene) resins. ABS is used to produce polymer shells used in products such as luggage and canoes. But, its primary use is for shock absorbing materials like automotive bumpers. Because there is typically a greater demand for vehicles compared to luggage and canoes, auto production has a greater impact on acrylonitrile and acetonitrile availability.
- Therefore, auto cycle slowdown -> lower acrylonitrile production -> storage constraints kick in and oligopoly structure in this market -> lower acetonitrile production -> constant demand for acetonitrile -> higher prices for acetonitrile
Of course, the price has gone up because of stellar earnings, no less contributed by acetonitrile prices. If auto cycle picks up in FY21, expect acetonitrile prices to go down. Expected anywhere between 130-150 cr PAT in FY20 and FY21.
2) Swiss Glascoat (or HLE Glascoat as it is called nowadays): Given these days of high visibility to high liquid, large cap stocks, obviously no one cares about low liquid and small cap stocks. So, what does HLE Glascoat do? HLE Glascoat Equipments specializes in two distinct segments: 1) design and manufacturing of carbon steel glass lined equipment [GLE] (reactors, receivers / storage tanks, columns, valves, pipes & fittings) with 25-30% market share (majority being held by GMM) and 2) ANFD/RVD centrifuges (> 50% market share).
If you ignore the jargon, these are products are sold to Pharmaceutical / API, Specialty Chemicals, Dyes/ Colours, Agro Chemicals, Food Processing and allied industries. Of course, China tailwinds is an integral part to the investing thesis goes without saying. Essentially, an Oligopoly business (GMM being its main competitor, currently at 50PE) with a visible China shift resulting in strong tailwinds in a relatively margin-proof capital goods equipment company serving this tailwind of large ongoing capex in the chemical, pharma and agrochemical space is the general thesis for investing in HLE.
So, what’s the variant perception in this?
- First of all, low liquid and small cap itself is death these days
- Swiss Glascoat was run by Mr. Sudarshan Amin and due to succession issues, was sold to HLE Engineers. Swiss is the 2nd largest player in GLE (with 25-30% market share), but HLE is a market leader in centrifuges (ANFD/RVD). Post NCLT approvals in October, the merged entity financials would start being reflected from Q2 FY20. With the increase in capex by all its customers (chemical, agrochem and pharma) , our estimate was that – the tri-criteria of lower sales, lower margins, lower multiple (due to being the 2nd largest player in one of the segments) and a de-motivated management will move to higher sales, higher margins (oligopoly, increasing demand, classic cap goods of higher prices), aggressive and SITG management and higher multiple (being the market leader in one of the segments)
- So, what if all this capex stops all of a sudden? Of course, it can stop anytime. But here’s where our ‘2nd level variant perception’ comes in (haha, when price of the stock goes up, all this can be said – advantages galore! for such ‘variant perceptions’ like I said). NGT approvals. NGT (National Green Tribunal) goes around the country and keeps raising one issue or another. Environmental clearances are not easy to come by, more so because of NGT. Here’s the real deal – China shift is not slowing down, environmental clearances have not completely stopped, but the clearances are coming in slowly and steadily – which is an amazing advantage to players like HLE – because the growth (of ~15% in sales) will continue for 2-3 years atleast instead of a single year of exponential growth (40%). Market has that much more time to stabilize and understand prospects than just move it up and kill on craziness
We expect SGEL (GLE) to clock a 30% CAGR growth for the next 2-3 years with increasing margins (~op margins of 15% are achievable). and expect HLE Engineers (ANFD/RVD) to clock a 15% CAGR growth for the next 2-3 years with increasing margins. We expect a combined turnover of ~500 cr in FY21/FY22) and expect about 45-50 cr PAT in FY21 and 55-60 cr PAT in FY22
3) Too long a post already I think (or in reality, those were the set of ‘variant perception’ winners in 2019). The other substantial 2 bets that we added to existing holdings in 2019 are Hikal (price didn’t go up, it actually went down by 30%, so nobody cares about our variant perception and no use writing thesis about it on the blog) and Axtel Industries (price didn’t go anywhere and yet again nobody cares about our variant perception and hence no details – but in general, low liquid, small cap, cap goods, aggressive management, food industry, large MNC clients, substantial exports traction is the general overview. If price moves in 2020, I will come back to write our ‘variant’ perception’ on this one).
4) There were multiple small positions (2-3%) in 2019 which worked out quite well / didn’t go nowhere – Suven, JM Fin etc. But they don’t affect the overall portfolio by much given their position sizes. So, really, who cares.
Blogposts (or podcasts these days) are never complete without general market gyaan, about which, like literally, nobody cares. But hey, we have come this far, so why not be indulgent in the final days of the decade. It’s an increasingly tough market with substantial flows into the market (due to Nifty not correcting perception and obviously TINA followed by FOMO). I expect FY20 to be even tougher because we are not a leveraged market at all post the NBFC crisis and therefore, very few players will go out of the market. I don’t expect the broader midcap and smallcap to bounce back (except select stocks) because of some weird idea called mean reversion (mean reversion can take years and not just because you had a tough last 2-3 years). There is a substantial, but little spoken about fact that has emerged in 2019 around export data for multiple stocks being shared widely (from authentic and not-so-authentic data sources) – it’s a bit of weird thing going on in the 2019 market because everybody thinks that they are the only ones who know about this data, and hence don’t talk about it in WA groups- but almost everybody knows about it these days so it’s become a commodity. A general pointer being, if anybody is pitching you a long forgotten idea and/or some sudden bullishness in an existing idea after 16th of every month, you can safely assume that good export data has been released, and people are attaching their own thesis (without quoting export data) to look like a visionary once the quarter results are out. Of course, we all take a good idea too far in India and therefore, this will come back to bite us very badly some day.
The End. Cheers to 2019. End of a decade (yes, for me 2020 is the start of a new decade – the number literally is a visionary year number). And what a decade it’s been in financial markets and personal net worths! The world has been kind in terms of bestowing so many fantastic and close friends in the past decade whom I can call upon for advise at any point in time – thank you one and all – and in no particular order – Om, Anant, Tirumal, Vivek, Dhruvesh, Ankit, Rahul, Dhwanil, Viraj, Prabhakar, Gordon, Puneet, Saurabh, Digant, Ashwini, Siddharth, Nooresh, Sandeep, Donald, Alokeji, Jagvir, Ayush, Deepak, Prashanth, Neeraj, Tejus, Rohit, Rajat, Bhagwan, Jatin, Abhimanyu, Anand, Dhaval and many more – my life and knowledge is 10x richer because of all of you. Our basis of friendship is investing, but we have shared many other aspects of life that all of this investing is now a side-show. Thank you one and all. It’s been my privilege.
Here’s to welcoming the next big decade (whatever that means!).
P.S: Best books read in 2019: Factfulness, Alchemy, Modern Monopolies, Anti-fragile (re-read), Man for all markets (re-read)
P.P.S: Best movies in 2019: Unfortunately, 2019 was not a rich set in Hindi/English stable. Telugu was outstanding. Andhadhun (Hindi), Uri (Hindi), Gully Boy (Hindi), Avengers: The End Game (English), Knives Out (English), Ford vs Ferrari (English), Agent Sai Srinivas Athreya (Telugu), Oh Baby (Telugu), Brochevarevarura (Telugu), Gang Leader (Telugu), Evaru (Telugu), Jersey (Telugu), Sye Ra (Telugu), C/o Kancharlapalem (Telugu), Goodachari (Telugu)
An inordinate amount of material exists on ‘what to buy’, ‘when to buy’, ‘how to buy’ etc. but very little material is written on ‘when/how/what to sell’. Research indicates (rather ‘pro-forma’ research or in plain English, ‘completely made-up’ research) indicates that the act of Selling rather than buying generates most of the returns (unless of course you are the chosen and select few to only buy HDFC Bank, Asian Paints in your portfolio for a long time).
Of course, this is not a blog post on ‘when/how/what to sell’. This blogpost is about the reasons often quoted on ‘when/how/what to sell’.
1) ‘Sell when your thesis is wrong’: This is the mother (in these income tax days, we can also say grandfather) of all reasons. The first reason that’s quoted in most articles – from fool.com to hedge fund letters.
Here’s what’s wrong with it. Our thesis are generally partially and most times completely bull and very very flaky. They are either earnings momentum driven or price driven. We are of the firm belief that if the prices of the stocks we buy go up, then our thesis is right. Else, management something something. Many examples that come flying to land on this point.
• Avanti Feeds was bought on ‘shrimp expansion/global market share gaining/TUF investing’ etc. The real returns of Avanti Feeds came in because raw material prices dropped precipitously and investors extrapolated that to infinity. The thesis of ‘shrimp expansion/global market share gaining/TUF investing’ still holds true, but is anyone interested in buying Avanti Feeds now? Not really.
• All chemical stories – from Excel Industries to Excel Crop Care to Vinati/Aarti (nowadays). Our thesis is right as long as the price is moving up and to the right. Once the price hits a 20% circuit down, our thesis falls off and we sell (or more critically, we hold and become a long term investor)
• All NBFCs. ‘ours is a credit-hungry nation, you know’, ‘millenial something something’. Large opportunity. Earnings momentum slows / price drops – all of this thesis is out of the window. ‘Earnings momentum’ is the justification given for others. For now. Till the price drops or momentum slows that is.
• Some classic stories – Mayur Uniquoters, Poly Medicure, PI Industries (till the price moved up recently) – some fantastic managements, large opportunity. Every thesis stays. But if the price doesn’t move up, we exit
• Graphite stocks. Haha. The next big commodity. Needle coke. Electric cars. Something something.
And many others. I am sure the market of Jan 2018 – Aug 2018 has given enough experience to know most of our returns have been lucky (80%) and thesis driven (20%). So this ‘sell when your thesis is wrong’ is so nuts – it confounds me.
2) ‘Sell when you find a better idea’ – We are under so many notions of our investing prowess, there is no limit to our ignorance. What’s the basis for a better idea? What constitutes a better idea? Do we even know and understand our current portfolio stocks enough to determine what a ‘better idea’ is? (see point 1). A ‘better idea’ for most of us means that ‘my stock is stagnant, that stock can give me better returns as the price is/may move up more than mine’. We all laugh at ‘bhala, uska kameez mere kameez se safed kaise’. We do this everyday.
All of us make mistakes (well, again pro-forma/completely made-up research indicates Buffett has only 60% hit ratio, so we are mere mortals). But this ‘better idea; concept is drilled into our heads (remember, ‘move your portfolio quality upwards in every market’). Portfolio quality is a sign of the times. Say, consumer stocks were and are of high quality (cashflows, ‘large opportunity’, good dividend payouts, something something…which indicates quality). But if you had invested in ‘consumer stocks’ in 2002-2008, your neighbor would have laughed so hard at you, even ex-LS MP couldn’t match it if she tried. If you have invested in capital goods in 2013-2018, well, my neighbours are still laughing at me. And evidence indicates most of our top quality capital goods companies are not very cyclical as they are made out to be.
So, what is a better idea? Flawed again.
3) ‘Sell when you need to rebalance your portfolio’: Hahaha! Rebalance, you said? You mean, I need to sell Vinati Organics and Aarti Industries which are going great guns and constitute 30% of my portfolio to invest in what? Capital goods? NBFCs? Didn’t you see there were a lot of defaults in NBFCs? Haven’t you heard the capex cycle will not take off for the next 2-3 years given most of our Banks (shh..PSBs) are under water? You say NMDC which is cheap, great dividend yield, lowest cost producer and something something? Are you nuts – haven’t you heard that the Govt. is wiping all the cash clean from all PSBs? I don’t want to take any such risks. Aarti/Vinati for life.
Rebalance it seems. This is like Bangladesh cricket team being called Tigers. Absolute bonkers you are. I am happy with my 30% of portfolio – who knows – can become like RJ’s CRISIL and Titan. Haven’t you heard of the maxim…only 2-4 stocks in your lifetime will give pushto-pushto returns? Rebalance my portfolio it seems. Rebalance your life dude.
4) ‘Sell when you need the money’: One of the better reasons to sell actually. The hitch though is, outside of emergencies, I need money all the time man! I have a Facebook account and an Instagram account. I can’t post photos about eating vada-pav at Agarwal-ji’s dabba. 2 foreign vacations a year, 1 new mobile a year. I also hear there is a real estate boom that’s about to take off magically in many parts of India – (don’t ask why man…still you ask..ok ok…demographics, more nuclear families, higher employment by selling samosas, something something). So, I need money all the time.
But you say opportunity cost? Now, what is this bloody thing called ‘opportunity cost’. Do we even know and understand what’s opportunity cost? Well, opportunity cost is 15% because historically Indian stock markets have given these returns..because something something. Well, you change the start period and end period, and voila, that can become 5% returns. Every asset class – gold, land, real estate, stocks, bonds – irrespective of asset class – you can change the start period and end period and one can argue endlessly about which asset class generates more returns.
I am Stanley Druckenmiller-like you say? I can invest and timely shift my portfolios across asset classes you say? Maybe ‘arts & painting’ is a higher opportunity cost bet you say? Of course. So, why do you need money for anything at all? Also, you should be on Twitter – there are many Stanley Druckenmillers out there who can get in the bottom, and get out at the top..in every single asset class…asset class no bar. You will need to hit the bar everytime you read their tweets.
5) ‘If the stock is overvalued, then one needs to sell’: If point 1 is grandfather, point 5 is grandmother (also can be mother sister, if you get the drift). First of all, what is overvalued?
• Is Symphony and Page at 100PE over-valued? Of course, you’d say. One must be crazy to buy even consumer stories at 100PE. Why? See their price action over the last couple of years.
• Is DMart over-valued at 80PE? Are you kidding? Did you see their earnings momentum? We are still in the infancy of the retail boom for lower capital people and look at demographics something something. But but, Walmart (‘every day low prices since 1975’ – yes that one!) had earnings growth for 25 years and stock hasn’t moved by much because of over-valuation back in the day, you say? Ah. Oh. Well, America old country, Trump, Bush, you know.
• Is Bajaj Finance at 100PE over-valued? Of course, not. Are you out of your mind? Look at the earnings growth. Look at Sanjiv Bajaj’s profile pic and prophetic statements around data science, data lake and data ocean. Look at the beauty of the balance sheet. Look at something something. Look at the earnings momentum and with a 30% growth (nah, let’s make that 40% because according to pro-forma research, millennials something something, with increased per capital something something, the pace of credit will only accelerate) over next 5 years, it is quoting at just 18.59PE. One must be nuts selling Bajaj Finance at 100PE.
• Is Aarti Industries/Vinati Organics overvalued at 35-40PE? Is Divis Laboratories overvalued at 50PE? Man, you are not following me. I just justified 80-100PE above. And now you are asking me about a cheaper PE. Follow me, listen to me. Carefully. These are the next big stocks – (why? because China something something) – they will get into Index. I will buy a Pali hill bungalow by selling these shares and then give an interview 10 years later regretting selling these shares. Have the vision to buy, courage to hold and goti to not sell etc.
• All these growth stocks give ‘plenty of time’ to exit, you know. One quarter bad result, I will trim. Once the earning momentum slows for 2 quarters, then I will exit. Plenty of time. Well, ask Pantaloon. Also, too many behavioral problems with that. Also, convergence of this idea has bad implications.
Every bull market, you’ll hear ‘zyaada khareedna tha’, ‘should have concentrated more’. Every bear market, you’ll hear ‘should have sold at the top’ etc. Given this post is about selling, and every investor has become wise post this bear market – these days, every investor is like ‘bech dunga, 15-20% neeche from top is my stop loss, will completely sell, will never make the mistake of holding on if it corrects by more than 15-20% etc. something something so that I protect my returns’. As if, every other investor is not thinking the same (and its race to the bottom). But boss, I just told you I am a smart investor..not like the retail something panic something dumb investor.
Yes dude. You are Stanley Druckenmiller. You should definitely be on Twitter.
P.S: Summary: Sab bhaav ke khiladi hai. Courtesy: Manu Manek. Unless of course, you are one of the select few to invest in HDFC Bank/Asian Paints for double-digit years (base rate of such stocks is really low) and have held them tight. Or more attractively, you were someone who invested Rs.10,000 in Wipro in 1980 and held on to become multi-crorepati in something something years (I was not even born then, so I am not that lucky).
Sometimes, or maybe most times, you need to revisit history and see how different you saw it vs how it actually turned out.
So is the case with stock analysis and our ‘creations’ and ‘fantasies’. ISGEC being one of them. I wrote about ISGEC here – https://kiraninvestsandlearns.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/isgec_stock-story1.pdf back in January 2015 with all kinds of bold statements and how the market was wrong.
Haha. Well, let’s see.
Marketcap in January 2015: 4100 cr
Marketcap in April 2019: 4100 cr
4+ years of 0 returns on the money one invested in the stock. Let’s take it slow, else it will hurt too much (innuendo alert!) – quotes from the pdf link above:
1) “The traction in its entire business is reasonably good with strong demand from exports and potential revival of domestic economy” – The order book then was 4000 cr. The order book (as of Dec’18) is 8275 cr. True story. Order book doubled, but no change in marketcap. And we assume order book drives marketcap most of the time.
2) “some segments of ISGEC had large under-utilized capacities and improving business climate can thereby lead reasonable operational leverage” –
Sales in FY15: 3900 cr, Sales in FY18: 3800 cr.
PAT in FY15: 117 cr, PAT in FY18: 157 cr
No change in market cap.
3) “Massive Operating Leverage still to come” – ROFL and offered with no comment!
4) “Consolidated results will have a kicker from: Saraswati Sugar Mills ISGEC – Hitachi Zosen JV (51:49)“: Sugar…well being Sugar didn’t end sweet. IHZL faced a massive Oil&Gas headwind (oil prices have dipped or gone nowhere in the last 4 years) and never scaled up to its potential due to cutback in investments.
5) “The fruits of the debottlenecking task taken by the new government may
start to show up anytime in the next 1-2 years. All in all, the opportunities from domestic market revival are quite big. With increase in demand, comes an increase in margins. On a massive sales base, even a 1% uptick in operating margins can give a
huge kicker to net profits” – I was just flying to the moon, wasn’t I? That’s what they say…aim for the stars and atleast reach the moon or something. Shahrukh Khan would be proud to take me onboard his company, Dreamz Unlimited.
6) “ISGEC Hitachi Zosen JV (We think this aspect is severely under-estimated by the markets)” – Haha, not really. Markets, as they mostly are, right this time.
6) I would say that this take the cherry on the piece of cake. “Investors investing at these levels might incur some opportunity cost. But management capability along with operating leverage makes this an attractive buy for any investor thinking 3-5 years” – I mean, really? What was I thinking? I ate the pudding alright. Massive opportunity cost. Attractive buy for 3-5 years view? This was a worse joke than RCB’s tag line of ‘ee sala cup namde’ (this time the cup is ours). What a prediction sirjee 🙂
a) It’s not just the growth of the order book, but composition of the order book that determines marketcap (as Market sees the future)
b) Even if you are right on order book, profits etc., Market’s mood may change and never give you the multiple you think it deserves
c) Don’t predict massive upturns or downturns.
d) Don’t depend on government.
e) Stop predicting in general, or altogether.
f) Stop writing stock stories. I mean, embarrassing really.
Given the nature of the season and with no reason, here are the quick lessons from 2018:
a) The Dumb Speculator: I used to think this as a very apocryphal story and always used to chuckle how silly the story is:
“Ben Graham told a story forty years ago that illustrates why investment professionals behave as they do. An oil prospector, moving to his heavenly reward, was met by St. Peter with bad news. “You’re qualified for residence,” said St. Peter, “but, as you can see, the compound reserved for oil men is packed. There’s no way to squeeze you in.” After thinking a moment, the prospector asked if he might say just four words to the present occupants. That seemed harmless to St. Peter, so the prospector cupped his hands and yelled, “Oil discovered in hell.” Immediately, the gate to the compound opened and all of the oil men marched out to head for the nether regions. Impressed, St. Peter invited the prospector to move in and make himself comfortable. The prospector paused. “No,” he said, “I think I’ll go along with the rest of the boys. There might be some truth to that rumor after all.”
Well, I am chuckling no more. Truer than ever, I believed the entire fantasy for one story in 2018 and had to sell 30% from the top instead of selling near the top. I had all justifications and calculations for why the top was ‘THE top’ given it was ridiculously overpriced, but then I thought, why not…maybe there is truth to all those fantasies after all. Ultimately, it boils down to whether you clicked ‘Buy’/’Sell’ than all the million justifications and calculations you do within your head.
b) The Aggressive Investor: I almost always take concentrated positions (8-10% atleast) and there was this one concall from a capital goods company that I thought had cracked it all. Of course, I built a serious position in it (8%) – justified with ‘backed with conviction’, ‘motivated management’, ‘diversified revenue’, ‘normally valued’ etc.
Obviously, not just me but the entire market thought that the company had cracked it all. And then disappointment. The position corrected 50% and now is 40% below my buying price. The market – as simple as it sounds – doesn’t care about your conviction or management stories. It cares about earnings and the earnings disappointed big time.
c) The Sheepish Investor: Given the burns of the aggressive position, I course corrected and then said to myself – maybe, just maybe this isn’t a market to build concentrated positions and went the other way…building ‘2%-3%’ positions in 4-5 stocks. As such, there is no fault in building 2-3% positions. However, when your inherent investing nature is to think and build concentrated positions, these small positions are the first ones to be cut out off the portfolio when you have conviction in other stocks where you can build a position.
So, unless these small positions turn out to be massive multi-baggers (atleast 4-5x), they tend to be a waste of time and energy given there is neither conviction nor position to sustain and eventually reap those returns.
d) Take the Gains and Bear the Losses: After a longish period of 6 years, I took substantial money off the table in a number of stocks. Was in 20-25% cash most of the year. And that enabled me to bear losses from a few stocks (mostly the 2-4% positions).
Given that one makes the biggest mistakes in bull markets (greed, staying on till the last minute or beyond for max gains, thinking you can ride momentum, inability to find ideas and yet find it painful to sit on more than 25% cash etc.), taking those losses is still painful. One can find solace that some of these losses will be offset against gains and thereby tax incidence will be lower – but that’s a false solace that we try to find comfort in. The real truth of making mistakes lurks in the background (and really, no way to get around the fact of making mistakes, other than try to reduce incidence).
e) Saying Thank You: So many family and friends to say Thank You to. Family has no option but to stick to you through thick and thin, but friends have zero obligation to bear all the mindless chatter. Thank You to multiple friends – O, V, C, A, D, V. Each one of those names have taught me more than I can ever learn through a myriad books and mistakes. So, Thank You. I broke even this year (0% returns basically on the portfolio) and largely thanks to all of you and your sagely advice (kudos to O though, who has been a rock).
f) Saying One more Thank You: One landmark reached and crossed in my professional career of Management Consulting as well (became a Principal at my Firm). I absolutely love Consulting and Investing, and thankful to God that he has given me opportunities in both these fields to strive and ability to try to excel (excelling or not is a different matter). The rush that I get in the first week of any client situation (this year was in Singapore) and the rush to find an unique angle (s) to stocks which the market might have missed is something that can’t be explained, and only can be experienced.
Investing as such is complex, but when compared to vagaries of Life itself (in terms of health, happiness, laughter, family, friends, tears, sickness and death), Investing is probably the simplest of the lot. The worst you can do is 7% in a FD. The major lesson of 2018 is to not fret a lot and just live life being aware of mortality.
So, Thank You for this opportunity – it’s been a pleasure to see you off 2018. Welcome 2019. Let the fun and frolic begin.
P.S: Best books read this year – ‘How I lost a Million Dollars’, ‘Anti-fragile’ (again), ‘Factfulness’, ‘The Art of Learning’ (again), ‘A man for all markets’, ‘Letters from a Stoic’, ‘Markets Never Forget, but People Do’ are a few of them.
It’s been a long time, close to 2.5 years since a post was written on this blog. Anyhoo.
Nobody has a doubt these days that it’s a bull market. Whether it’s in the mature bull market stage or the euphoric bull market stage, only time will tell (my personal opinion being, still in mature bull market stage). On the investing scale of Novice to Professional, am still on the Novice stage, so pardon my conclusions/prognosis in my first extended bull market:
a) Re-rating mania: Lesser and lesser percentage of folks want to talk about business economics and earnings. More and more of them want to bet on re-rating – ‘arey boss, sabko pata hai re-ratings se hi paisa jaldi banta hai’. Letting the tape decide (as re-rating is entirely that) your investing actions is a bit fraught with danger (unless of course you are a trader – of whom I have many good friends – and their risk management, trade management is top notch). But hey, all of us have made good money in the past few years only on re-rating, very few on real earnings growth – so yeah – don’t complain.
b) Books: I have read some stellar books in the past few years – and in no particular order – ‘Markets don’t forget, people do’, ‘The Bull’, ‘Lessons from History’, ‘Sapiens’, ‘Short history of financial euphoria’ etc. and it’s been enlightening to say the least. What I am surprised by, is this access to information is so easy these days. If I can take you back to 1990s, I could not get a Tinkle easily and today, we get the best of the books with a single click. What this does to investors/traders knowledge and psychology today in a market is beyond comprehension – given that this investing/trading in India (and mostly abroad) – was a closed circle phenomenon. I am not talking of the incessant ‘guile of insights’ that float around in various Whatsapp groups where you can’t remember what someone posted 1 day ago, much less a month ago. This knowledge of these books – distilled wisdom really – has had a profound impact on my thinking, and hopefully many other thousands of investors who have entered the bull market in the last few years. Greed and fear will continue – as it has for thousands of years – but I am kind of expecting that the % of people (as a total of investing population) who will get hammered will be much reduced. Learnings will be faster. Whipsaws will be faster. Opportunities will be lesser.
c) 3 pillars: If you believe that 3 pillars will continue to stay – capitalism, entrepreneurship and democracy – for any country/industry, I believe that one can make money in the long term. Entry price is definitely a determinant of stellar returns, but these 3 pillars are more important to make steady returns over the long term (better than fixed deposit, that is).
d) SIP mania: The whole mania around SIPs will continue for much longer than people think. We many move across sectors, small/mid to large caps etc., but TINA or no TINA, these SIPs will continue (the avg. or the median SIP amount has not changed by much in the last decade – but incomes have gone up – and therefore the % SIP amount does not pinch anymore for other discretionary or big budget items). I think it will take a massive crash, and not a demonetization or a 2011 crash to take these people out of the market.
e) On the investing front, I only bought a couple of stocks in the last year as I couldn’t find much else/could not understand some sectors. I don’t believe markets are crazily valued in some sectors at this stage. As I said earlier, I don’t believe we are in the euphoric stage yet.
And, in conclusion, I believe what I wrote in Sep 2014 (This time it’s different) still holds true, especially this part –
The fallacy of selling 20% below the top: Which brings me to my next and favorite topic. Nobody wants to leave the party that is going on. Value investors are very famous and take great pride in laughing at the stupid statement of former executive of Citibank saying “”As long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance.” We laugh and laugh at that stupidity. We quote Buffett. We quote Munger. Why, these days, we have become more exotic and even quote Daniel Kahneman and his super book ‘Thinking, Fast and Slow’. But almost no-one wants to exit the party. These days, the hypothesis is even better. These days, investors say that ‘let the market reach the top and then correct…we’ll all get out 15%-20% from the top’. Let me explain this fallacy through a famous picture:
That’s the chart of the IT bubble – starting from 1996, all the way till 2001. All those investors who say ‘let the market reach the top and then correct……’, would they get out at all the points marked ‘Red’ in color – then they would have missed all the returns. ALl of the them plan to get out at the ‘Orange’ market – how would they know in advance? Conversely, in reality, wouldn’t most investors get out at all the points marked ‘Green’ in color – throwing in the towel? Every investor worth his salt wants to get out at the point marked in ‘Orange’. How many can do it? I seriously doubt if it would be in high single digits.
Then again, the lure and the logic is too irresistible. Combine that fallacious logic of immediately getting out at the right moment with your neighbor (rather, twitter/whatsapp friends) making more money than you everyday – and you have got a dynamite waiting to blow up. We all want to dance till the last minute, irrespective of how many times we read Buffett pleading ‘the clock has no hands’.
Let’s enjoy the bull market till it lasts. I am still cautiously optimistically bullish – or whatever hell that means.
‘Recent History’ – an oxymoron, as history is typically measured in decades if not more.
However, given that most PMS funds, hedge funds and all kinds of investors proclaiming their vision and CAGR all over the place by choosing a very convenient 2009-2011 start dates/years to calculate their CAGR, I think ‘recent history’ would serve as a good reminder for all of us that mortality (in investing, as in life) is a good idea to revisit now and then.
Take a look at this snapshot and spend some time reading through the image:
An emerging STAR fund. Or you can call it by any other name. Portfolio as of Jan 2008. The name of ICICI is not even relevant here, as most mid-cap and small cap funds (and other funds masquerading as value funds) ended up in a similar fate in the great crash of 2008.
Look at the holdings of this fund in detail and ponder. Ponder for a moment, and especially on these lines:
a) The holdings in the portfolio were THE emerging names – with ‘quality’, ‘management integrity’, ‘scale of opportunity’ written all over them – back in 2008. Like we have many names now. With all three adjectives being attached to many of the names.
b) Access to Investing wisdom is not new (already available in 2008). Even the fund managers of ICICI STAR fund had access to a lot of investing books and Buffett’s letters.
c) Scuttlebutt is not new. Fund managers have had access to managements for as long as one can remember.
d) Access to networking is not new. Fund managers have always been widely networked. Only that networking has got more democratic because of technology (and especially whatsapp). Previously, there might have been panics in bursts. These days, there is a panic every day because of costless distribution of any written word.
d) Asset heavy businesses got massacred. Oh, well. We “know” about this now – we never invest in asset heavy businesses, right? Wait till the replacement cost bull market takes over.
d) Asset light businesses also got massacred. Either because the management turned out to be fraud or their industry turned out to be irrelevant.
e) What you don’t see in the snapshot is the price multiples one might have paid for those businesses. Given that ‘infra’ was all the rage back then, the P/E multiples were also high, pretty much with similar explanations that we are attributing to some sectors these days.
There are many more points to ponder just by looking at this image, which is basically a snapshot of the investing theme/rage back then.
i) Why do you think your portfolio of 2015 is not like the STAR fund portfolio of ICICI of 2008?
ii) What makes you ultra-confident (dare I say, cocky)? [I pretty much assume all of us are going to say ‘nope’ to i) above]
iii) What are the steps one might want to take/plug your learnings to not repeat i) and ii) above? [Hint: Whatsapp/Investing forums is definitely not the answer]
George Bernard Shaw made an epic statement when he said – “We learn from history that we learn nothing from history”. The history of markets is replete with same mistakes repeated over and over again, each time with a different twist (mostly unimaginable/black swan).
Given the proliferation and access to information, let us atleast attempt to learn from history this time? I started with an oxymoron, and I think I ended with one 🙂
P.S: Post inspired by a conversation with a friend who chooses to be anonymous, but is bloody brilliant.
P.P.S: If you think ICICI STAR fund didn’t really tickle your senses, and you are craving for more, here is a more elaborate chart on an assortment of businesses – more varieties than you can find in a Walmart store – quality, scale of opportunity, management integrity, vision, mission, goal, rags-to-riches, first generation promoter – choose your poison – and the current market value is not even 1/10th of what it was.